Fingerprints of the Gods: My Analysis

By Madison Nef
This week, I read a different yet intriguing book entitled ‘Fingerprints of the Gods’. While it was long and rather long-winded in my opinion, I would recommend it to thinkers. Thinkers being people interesting in conspiracy theories, archaeology, geology and what our Earth was like back before we had many records. The book highlights some of the newer findings of both science and archaeology and also touches upon many different theories of how ancient civilizations likely had more advanced technology than we suspect.

There are countless bits of evidence pointing to this; but no one really took the time to piece them all together- until this book. This guy really thought out his theories and put them down in an understandable format, sectioning them off throughout the book as it goes on. Since I only have 5 pages to cover everything, I’m going to only touch on the parts I found important. I’ll break them down into different pieces as the paper goes on.

The Antarctic Maps

The first topic I’d like to speak about is the first topic really covered in the book- Antarctica and the maps that were discovered that show Antarctica... but WITHOUT the 2 miles of ice that cover it today. The map depicts Queen Maud Land in Antarctica, without ice on it. Based on what scientists know today, this would mean the original cartography of the map was done a very long time ago... say, maybe... a few million years old. This is judged off of the size and depth of the ice caps that currently make Antarctica what it is.

Further looking into this map, it is assumed that Admiral Piri Reis drew it back when Queen Maud Land and the areas surrounding it were not covered in any ice at all. This suggests highly that there was a long period of time where Antarctica was NOT covered in ice... this period may not have come to an end entirely until just 6,000 years ago.

However, that can be a subject for another time. I’d like to focus on the known FACTS about the Piri Reis map, which are as follows:

It’s a genuine map, not a fake- and it was made at Constantinople in the year 1513 AD.
It’s main focuses are on the western coast of Africa, the eastern coast of South America, and the northern coast of Antarctica.
It would have been impossible for Piri Reis to learn about the northern coast of Antarctica from other explorers... Antarctica wasn’t discovered officially until 1818 AD, which was 300 years later than the date the map was created.
The ice-free coastline depicted in the Piri Reis map is also a mystery. Geological evidence we have today shows that the LATEST the map could have possibly been made (or that the coastline could have been surveyed ice-free) would have been 4000 BC- a huge leap from 1513 AD.
There is no known civilization that would have been skilled enough OR who would have had a need to record their land in such a way between the relevant dates- 13000 and 4000 BC.

Therefore, it is a mystery on how these coastlines were recorded so ACCURATELY without ice... if the technology (so far as we know) was not available. Piri Reis himself stated in handwritten notes on the map that he was simply putting together pieces left behind by other map-makers and explorers. These notes left no indication to who these previous explorers and charters could have been, leaving us to assume and guess using the little bits of evidence we have that there was a civilization before us with more advanced technology... a civilization that disappeared without a trace and only exists in the minds of conspiracists.

However, since Antarctica is covered over with so much ice... there is no way to see what is underneath it. In many cultures, there are tales of Atlantis or a lost city that has never been found... perhaps this lost city was Antarctica. There is proof that the magnetic poles are shifting- if it’s happening now, it makes sense that it has happened in the past too. Calculating time, it fits with the time Antarctica started to form ice caps, etc.

This means that if Antarctica DID shift. If there was a time where it was without ice (which there clearly was, the maps are proof); that there could be an entire lost civilization and SO MUCH MORE that we know absolutely nothing about... lost underneath 2 miles of ice. I think it’s a very plausible theory and I agree with it 100%- as I type this, the poles are shifting slightly... each year they drift, and it’s only a matter of time before the shift is dramatic enough to change our entire planet like it did before.

Egypt, the pyramids, and the Precession Theory

Before we even get started in this section... you may be wondering what precession is. Google defines it as this:

“Precession is a change in the orientation of the rotational axis of a rotating body. In an appropriate reference frame it can be defined as a change in the first Euler angle, whereas the third Euler angle defines the rotation itself.”

However, the precession that will be used as an example in this part of the report is related to the Earth, and how it rotates. The Earth’s precession is caused by its gravitational pull to the Sun and Moon. Everything works together to keep the Earth rotating on its axis.

So what does this have to do with the pyramids of Egypt, OR anything else..? Well... allow me to explain.

The great pyramids of Egypt have been tested and science has proved that they were built roughly 10,000 years ago... or at least; the bottom halves. You see, when examining the pyramids- there is a distinct difference between the bottom and top halves. The bottom half of the pyramids are built with larger, much heavier blocks... and the top halves are built with smaller and more lightweight blocks. After testing the two types of blocks, it’s been found that the blocks from the top half are much more recent than that of the lower half. The top blocks date to about 2,400 years ago, at most.

Now, why would this matter..? You may be asking yourself. The significance in this doesn’t really lie in the dates themselves; but rather what the civilizations who BUILT these pyramids knew about precession and astrology.

You see, by using precession... we can trace back in history what the sky used to look like. We can use the mathematical calculations and see what the sky looked like at the exact time of the pyramids being built. When we do this... we can see that the three pyramids line up EXACTLY with the three stars that make up what we know today as Orion’s belt. What’s more, how they line up with the Nile shows that the Nile represents where the Milky Way would have been.

On top of this, there is also the Sphinx. The Sphinx has been the source of mystery for some historians AND scientists for awhile now- the issue being that the Sphinx appears to be modeled after a lion. The problem with this is that lions were NOWHERE even close to Egypt at the time of the pyramids, and there was no way that the builders could have known they existed... if you think the Sphinx is modeled after a REAL lion; that is.

How many of my readers have heard the song “Age of Aquarius”? It’s an older song that I only know of due to my dad, and I don’t really like it. However, it serves its purpose for this report. The reason for the song title (and lyrics, if you listen to it) is because the Age of Aquarius is the next Zodiac age we’ll be going into. The cycle of precession lasts for 25,800 years. A full cycle would bring us back to the start of the cycle, or repeat the signs again. Most astrologers believe that we are currently in the Age of Pisces, which will soon likely come to an end (though there is no way to be CERTAIN). In any case, each Zodiac age lasts roughly 2,150 years.

Using precession to once again travel back through history, we can see that the year the pyramids were being built was yep- you guessed it- the Age of Leo. Now, what does Leo represent as a constellation? A giant lion. Since the ancient Egyptian civilization was deep into astrology (or so it can be assumed by all the references they left behind); they left the Sphinx behind as a reminder of what age it was. Now, for them to know what the Age of Leo even was... it means that this ancient civilization understood precession and what it meant and that it COULD be used to trace back in the future!
More proof that the Egyptians knew about the theory of precession was how often it showed up in their architecture... Okay let’s be honest right now, Egyptians were VERY precise with their measurements and how they built. Each pyramid is so immaculately constructed that it puzzles scientists to this DAY on how they moved such large blocks of heavy stone and placed them so well. Something worth noting... is the measurements of the pyramids.

The measurements of the pyramids... relating to height and base measurement, that is- were equal to spherical proportion when calculating with pi. I really don’t feel like re-looking up all the numbers as it is late right now, but the numbers were off by a few fractions of a decimal. The reasoning behind this? The pyramids are thought to be based off of the sphere that is Earth... but the Earth is not a perfect sphere. Due to the lovely line we call the equator, the Earth protrudes out a bit and makes it not a perfect sphere.

Now... take a guess at just how off the calculations were. Just about enough to be accurate if you were to take an average guess at the protrusion in Earth. Thus, it is believed that the ancient civilization had some semblance of mathematical formulas and ALSO knew that the Earth wasn’t a perfect sphere. The accuracy of these calculations hints to much more advanced technology than even what we have today.

The final key that points to astrology and technology being the driving points of the ancient Egyptian civilization? The angle of a ramp going up to the King’s Chamber in the great pyramids. The ramp is on an even 26 degree angle ALL THE WAY UP... and is constructed entirely of the large blocks that have caused scientists and architects an issue for awhile now. The accuracy is amazing, and it is certain that the angle was on purpose because normally in building; even in pyramids, it would be easier to just make a 90 or 180 degree ramp; and not go to the trouble of making the direct 26 degree angle. Now, where before have we seen a number very close to 26..? Oh yes. The entire cycle of precession... which lasts 25,800 years. Coincidence? I think not, especially not considering the wise placement of the ventilation shafts in both the king AND queen chambers of the pyramids. Each vent was pointed at an angle that completed the constellation- if you used precession to rewind time and see what the stars looked like.

I think this is PLENTY proof that the people who came before us were a lot smarter and advanced than we give them credit for... and that they were trying to leave clues, knowing that the future generations would know of precession as well.

I recommend this book to everyone. In fact, send me a reply or comment a reply on your own theories; and your opinion of this report.

~Maddie

Civil War

Civil War Notes
By Madison Nef
This paper is a continuation of my last one. Last time, we saw where Kentucky and Missouri stood in the Civil War. In this paper, I’d like to discuss Maryland and Delaware. Let’s get started!

Maryland

Maryland was a very annoying state during the Civil War to Lincoln. The reason for this was due to its bothersome location. Baltimore and most of eastern Maryland favored the Confederacy, the Union 6th Regiment of Massachusetts was attacked by Baltimore in April, the pro-Confederates isolated Washington through destroying bridges and cutting the telegraph wires.

Due to this, Maryland’s state legislature voted to join and recognize the Confederacy... and Lincoln acted quite abruptly, afraid to lose another state to the Confederacy. He automatically sent troops into Baltimore to do a number of things: suspend the writ of habeas corpus in that part of the state, watch as Federals arrested pro-Confederate citizens, and to take large measures to make sure the Union won in the 1961 governor’s race.

Due to this, Maryland remained with the Union- but sent troops to both armies; 40,000 to the North and 20,000 to the South.

Delaware

Delaware; on the other hand, was always loyal to the Union, never staggering or doing anything to disprove it. There were a minimal number of slave-holders in the state, and its entire economic structure leaned towards the North. A very small number of Delaware citizens joined the Confederate army. The remainder of the state banded together with western Virginia citizens who still supported the Union, and formed West Virginia.

In the end, having control and the support of these border states was vital to the Union. Not only did they have control of major rivers such as the Mississippi, Tennessee and Cumberland, but they also had full access to them for battle and strategies.

On the other hand, the Confederates were denied many vital military resources, the access to these major rivers which would have proved useful during combat, animals, minerals, food, manpower, and obviously; land. Thus, the retention of these 4 border states was a large key victory point for the Union.

To sum everything up- all the political warfare and tug-of-war between the Union and the Confederacy over the 4 border states in the end produced a fifth border state- West Virginia- which sided with the Union as well.

~Maddie

Civil War

Civil War Notes

By Madison Nef

Upon first inspection, it would appear that the North had a clear upper hand with many advantages in almost every category to secure a victory against the South. The writings from this time period have been extremely helpful today in identifying how things were, and most of them claimed that the South was fighting a glorious but rather pointless and failing battle for an independence that would never exist.

To be honest, important resources were just about equally split between both of the sides. In this lecture, we got a bit of an in-depth look at these resources and the point that the battle’s fate was not predetermined was the main lesson to be learned. Below, I’ve gone through some of these strong points for each side; AND given a little about what happened.

The North

*The North almost lost TWICE just due to the Confederacy trying to convince them that the battle they were fighting was too costly, both in human lives AND money.  

·        More manpower, with a 5:2 ratio compared to the South. The North had a population of 22.5 million, which was gigantic compared to the South’s 9.1 million; 3.5 million of which were black… and of those 3.5 million, only about 130,000 were free. The North called upon their large population, especially on both white and black males who had never supported slavery to begin with.

·        A bigger economy was also to the North’s advantage. 110,000 businesses that employed 1.3 million people was what the North had- compared to the South’s decreasing 18,000 businesses that employed roughly 100,000 workers. This meant that the North had more businesses running… than the North had working in the businesses they owned.

·        The North ALSO controlled far more of the railroads, if you remember from an earlier report. This was a GIGANTIC advantage- they owned about 22 thousand miles worth of track, while the Confederacy only had about 9 thousand. Due to such easy access to fast transportation, trading and production of goods in the North flourished with the sales of iron, ships, textiles, animals, and weapons that the South could not compete with.

·        Finally, the North had a large professional army and navy to start the war with… though this did not prove as useful as you may think. The US army itself had a grand total of 15,000 fighters, and these were spread out across the continent… most were to the west of Mississippi. The Navy had only 42 working vessels, and even so was not much help as they were not trained for riverside fighting.

The South

*The South was clearly the weaker force in the battle, yet still believed they could win simply by debunking their enemies’ morals.

·        Being defensive of their own turf served as an advantage for the South due to the fact that the side protecting its home was often perceived as the more dedicated and motivated side.

·        Geography was also helpful. The size of the Confederacy ranged about 750,000 miles with 3,500 of those being coastline. This posed as both a threat AND a problem to the US army. It also helped that the Confederates knew their own roads and trails a LOT better than the North- by staying inside their own bounds, they also got rid of the risk of getting lost.

·        Access to the South was easy- at least by boat; which was good since the US Navy weren’t very skilled with smaller bodies of water. More than 200 mouths of rivers and bays gave complete access to the South, but it was relatively safe. The Appalachian mountains also stood in the way of the North- quite a discouraging trip.

·        After the mountains came the Shenandoah Valley- which was good shelter and good for enclosed military action.

·        Finally, the LACK of transportation in the South also served as an advantage because it confused the US army some and it was harder for them to move as fast as they were used to.

So you see, both sides had their own advantages. In this lecture, the disadvantages were not discussed… but I personally can’t wait to see what inconvenienced these armies too. In the next lecture, all the disadvantages will be discussed and then I’ll add them on as a ‘Part 2’ to this paper.

I think what surprised me most was the fact that the lack of transportation served the South as an advantage. I mean; it makes sense when you think about it… but looking at it from the side that had access to easy transportation, they probably only saw it as a disadvantage, not realizing that it slowed them down considerably. I guess it just goes to show that the quickest route… is not always the best one.

~Maddie

Civil War Notes

Civil War Notes

By Madison Nef

In the time that was lodged in between the war and the secession, the US and the Confederacy both “fought” for the support (and control over) the eight remaining slave states in the Union. While the president at the time (James Buchanan) wanted to appease everyone, INCLUDING the slaveholders through many different deals and empty compromises, Republicans grounded themselves and would not change their outlook. They wanted a complete ban on slavery.

Buchanan didn’t see the secession for what it was, and intended to continue enforcing laws; stating so. He suggested that a correction be made in the constitution in its laws that would protect slavery and abolish the ‘personal liberty’ laws of the North. Said laws were very important to the North, as they were the northern states’ response and rebellion to slavery. Buchanan even went as far as to suggest trying to take over Cuba and use it as a slave state in its own right.

If you think Buchanan’s offer was generous, just wait until you hear this. Often regarded as one of the most famous compromises regarding territorial rights in history, Senator John Crittenden from Kentucky sided with the South (in case you’ve forgotten; the slaveholders). He went as far as to fight for slave-holding rights to be legal in all territories below 36-30 degrees. Republicans fought viciously to keep this bill from passing and won twice, and since both sides were so disagreeable; the thought of a compromise was pushed aside.

Lincoln had been treading very lightly around this issue even before his election. He was silent as he succeeded Buchanan in 1861; believing that the south would work itself out and that Unionists would deal with the problem and whip the south into shape. The way he had things set up for himself, any fighting would be automatically dropped on the head of the Confederates and he wouldn’t have to deal with it. He believed that the Fed government would run and govern the entire country; including the south… stating that he “would not use force, but would enforce the laws”.

But let’s get to the point of what my lecture was about, shall we? This lecture’s center point was the story of Fort Sumter; which was located in the Charleston Harbor. Now, this fort was the source of the crisis that sprung forth, mainly for where it stood. Those in the North saw it as US property since it was the US that installed it, and wanted it claimed as their own. On the other hand; Confederates complained that is was on South Carolina soil and was therefore rightfully the South’s.

Lincoln made a poor decision to restock the fort in April of 1861, when this debate was not yet settled… and it drew forth an extremely aggressive response from Davis and his government. Davis’ troops shot at and captured the fort quite easily, which led Lincoln to call in over 75,000 volunteers to give their lives over and fight this surprising rebellion. This nightmarish chain reaction led to Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas and Tennessee joining the Confederate side.

Let’s do a recap… since this is what essentially led up to the start of the war.

It all began when Lincoln thought it would be a WONDERFUL idea to re-equip the fort with an un-armed vessel. Buchanan had attempted to do this during his presidency, but had failed. Since then, Fort Sumter had become a beacon for both the Union AND the Confederacy.

On March 5^th of 1861, Lincoln made a SERIOUSLY bad decision. The commanding officer at Sumter had sent Lincoln a message letting him know that he was running out of provisions. When Lincoln decided to restock the fort, he went against the advice- and general opinion- of many of the people who advised him, including William Seward and General Winfield Scott. Despite this, Lincoln still believed that the northerners wanted to hold onto the fort (which wasn’t entirely wrong).

Upon finding this out, Davis’ government replied with a bombardment and attacking the fort viciously. While it may have seemed that Davis had the upper hand in all of this, all is not as it seemed… Davis had faced a choice of many bad decisions to begin with. He didn’t particularly want to be viewed as the bad guy in any of the commotion taking place, so he tried to ask the fort to surrender. However; this failed and the popular opinion of the Confederacy was to sack and overtake the fort… and on April 15, Davis could no longer withhold the army and they rampaged the fort for over 36 hours.

News of this rebellion spread like wildfire during that time, sparking many different (and clashing) opinions in both the north and south. Finally, Lincoln called in 75,000 volunteers to end the rebellion.

It was because of this call that the upper south withdrew from the Union. After everything that had gone on, 4 of the upper states (all are mentioned above) decided that they would rather secede and join the Confederacy than force their own people to go out and fight against a cause they seemed to support. The public opinion about the secession had been rather garbled in these states to begin with, but the call for help from Lincoln was enough to turn all against him.

The secession of these states made it considerably harder to reunite the Union… now, 11 states had sided with the Confederacy and the future seemed rather bleak.  The four states that left the Union were now supplying MANY more soldiers- good soldiers- to the Confederacy, and it also contained most of the important industrial and agricultural resources. To signify the importance of Virginia, the capital of these states was moved from Montgomery to Richmond VA- where over 40% of the South’s manufacturing took place.

As this lecture came to a close, I couldn’t help but wonder what would come next. This chapter in history really captured my attention… but the rest is for next time.

~Maddie

Civil War

Civil War Notes

By Madison Nef

Picking up where my last section of notes left off- most Southerners began to view the Republican’s election victory as a huge triumph for those in the North who wanted to abolish slavery, slave trading etc. This held especially true for seven of the “Deep” southern states: South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Georgia, Texas and Florida. Pro-secessionist colonies quickly formed in these states, and by December of 1860, the lower states began to pass ordinances of secession.

-          ~Delegates sent to a convention in Montgomery

-          ~Constitution written and government established for a new nation

-          ``~“Confederate States of America”

These “Confederate States” began to model themselves and build up on what the states had already built, calling themselves the rightful successors and promoting themselves as better than the original states. The Confederate leaders of these states chose well-balanced leaders, and then began conversing with the only 8 slave-holder states left in the country: Arkansas, Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia; asking them to join them.

This initial phase of succession represented a large but risky step for the Lower South in protecting slavery rights- it was largely frowned upon and many of the polls guaranteed defeat, calling it an attempt to “undermine the economic and social bases of their society”.

The Montgomery Convention

The convention was held in early February of 1861. It was at this convention that the Confederate States were born. As mentioned above, the Confederate States ripped off most of what they were from the original states- in fact, the only key difference was the laws and opinions about slavery!

The Confederates elected Jefferson Davies of Mississippi as their President, but decided to not make any large decisions that could affect the chances they had at bringing over the remaining 8 slave-holding states to their side. However, they did make it clear that they would not allow African slave trading. Their constitution, while it did not support trading, DID explicitly protect slavery as a business.

I wanted to take a moment and go through some of the key... groups, I guess, that took a large part in the events of the secession.

Immediate secessionists were often times Breckenridge supporters. These people wanted each state to act immediately and believed that the best course of action was to cut all ties from the Union and the other states. They thought that by doing so, it would promote a new type of independence, safety, and southern unity. Immediate secessionists had good allies in the lower south, and drew a lot of support.

Cooperationists were mostly supporters of Bell, with a small percentage supporting Douglas. This means they were comprised of mainly former democrats. That aside, they differed from immediate secessionists because they recognized that the South was in great danger and knew that they would be forced to provide strong guarantees to protect their rights and slavery if Georgia stayed with the Union and did not join them.

Cooperationists figured the best way to handle things would be to hold conventions in the 8 upper South states, and use farming prospects to convince them to leave the Union. However, with the secession of more than half of the nearby states without any conventions; the cooperationists seemed rather defeated and were no where near as active with campaigning as the immediate secessionists were.

Unionists typically lived in the Upper South and the border states. They were anti-secession and refused to give help to the Confederacy. During the war, unionists offered full support to the Union. Now; don’t get the title garbled. There were two types of unionists- the type of unionist who supported the Union simply for its ideals, and the type of unionist who simply stood by the Union as a defiance to slavery. Most unionists were as much against the war as they were against slavery.

Unionists (including Lincoln) also wrongly believed that Cooperationists were anti-secession and expected a backlash that never came in the south against the sentiments of the secession.

All southerners had different opinions about what Montgomery represented. Some thought it was a revolutionary response to Lincoln’s election; while others thought it was purely legal. Initially, it was compared to the American Revolution of the past century and most thought that it was an attempt to throw off the central force of power.

While the hope had been for a nice, peaceful separation of the states; the Confederacy took to force and military action multiple times. They overtook Federal forts and raided the arsenal, activated the militia, and authorized a large army of over 100,000 men. At the time this was seen as a large problem, but later arguments insisted that the Lower South had acted legally and that what they did was fine because it complied with the Constitution’s law about state sovereignty.

Secession is impossible to separate from the institution of slavery. The Low South accepted and loved the secession, seeing it as a way to drive away northerners and their attempts to get rid of slavery. The biggest fear of the Southerners was losing all they had worked for to northerners... but we’ll focus on that NEXT TIME.

I hope you enjoyed this paper and learned something useful. I know I did.

~Maddie

Civil War Notes

Civil War Notes

By Madison Nef

Picking up where my last section of notes left off- most Southerners began to view the Republican’s election victory as a huge triumph for those in the North who wanted to abolish slavery, slave trading etc. This held especially true for seven of the “Deep” southern states: South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Georgia, Texas and Florida. Pro-secessionist colonies quickly formed in these states, and by December of 1860, the lower states began to pass ordinances of secession.

-          -Delegates sent to a convention in Montgomery

-          -Constitution written and government established for a new nation

-          -“Confederate States of America”

These “Confederate States” began to model themselves and build up on what the states had already built, calling themselves the rightful successors and promoting themselves as better than the original states. The Confederate leaders of these states chose well-balanced leaders, and then began conversing with the only 8 slave-holder states left in the country: Arkansas, Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia; asking them to join them.

This initial phase of succession represented a large but risky step for the Lower South in protecting slavery rights- it was largely frowned upon and many of the polls guaranteed defeat, calling it an attempt to “undermine the economic and social bases of their society”.

Solar System

The Galaxies, The Stars and The Sun

By Madison Nef

The Sun

The sun is the largest star in the galaxy that is currently known. It is in the center of the Solar System, and all planets in our Solar System revolve around it. Compared to the planets, the sun is extremely large- to the point that it takes up 99.86% of the system’s mass. The sun is 865,000 miles wide, which makes it 110 times wider than the Earth… and Earth isn’t even the largest planet! No wonder. 74% of the sun’s mass is hydrogen. Helium makes up roughly 24%, and a combination of the heavier elements (oxygen, carbon, iron and neon) make up the remaining percentages.

The sun is also extremely hot, if you were stupid enough to not know. However, I bet you didn’t know EXACTLY how hot it is! It’s 5,500 degrees Celsius on the surface, with its core being a whopping 13,600,000 degrees Celsius!   

It also generates a large amount of energy by combining large amounts of hydrogen nuclei into helium. This is called nuclear fusion… also; because of the sun’s huge impact on the Earth, many ancient cultures thought or portrayed the sun as a deity or a god. Some famous examples of this are Ra, the Egyptian sun god and Tonatiuh, the Aztec sun god.

The Stars

What even is a star? Do you ever wonder this..? I do. A star is actually a large sphere of hot gas, known as plasma, that is being held together by its own gravity. Stars radiate energy created by nuclear fusion, much like a smaller-scale version of the sun (since the sun is just a gigantic star). This creates helium. As a star begins to die (yes, they die), it changes the helium slowly into heavier chemical elements like carbon and oxygen. When this happens, the star changes drastically in color, density and size, resulting in its death.

The sun is closest to the Earth, and is known as a “G2 yellow dwarf star”. Boy, if they think the sun is a dwarf star… I’d hate to see what they mean by a big star! Anyway, besides the sun, the nearest star to Earth is Proxima Centauri. It’s 4.2 light years away… meaning that light from that star would take 4.2 years to reach Earth from where it is located. Even using the fastest and most efficient technology known today, it would take roughly 75 thousand years to get there.

Each galaxy contains hundreds of billions of stars… and there are estimated to be hundreds of billions of GALAXIES. Agh, inception! In the Milky Way alone, there are well over 400 billion stars… and that’s what we KNOW of. In the entire universe, there is estimated to be about somewhere from 70-300 sextillion stars. Most of these stars have lifespans of 1-10 billion years; depending… and some appear to be the age of the Universe (observed) itself- 13.8 billion years old.

The Galaxies

Let’s finish up with galaxies- a galaxy is a large group of stars, star clusters, gas and dust that is all held together by gravity. The only thing that separates galaxies from being one gigantic star is the dark matter that is also mixed it. The word is derived from the Greek word for ‘milky’; which is thought to be a reference to the Milky Way.

Most galaxies are gigantic, and average size is somewhere between 10 million (which is considered small) and 100 trillion (which is considered large). There are an estimated 170 billion+ galaxies in our universe- putting the number of stars at over 100 sextillion.

While galaxies are quite similar in many ways, there ARE some variations. There are many different shaped galaxies, the two most popular and most prominent being elliptical and spiral.

Elliptical galaxies are shaped like a disk, and because of this are typically larger and are usually very old. They also have less gas and dust, lowering the creation rate of new stars within them.

Spiral galaxies are stereotypical galaxies- rotating flattened disks with at least two spirals of new stars roping out from the center hold of older stars. The heavy molecular clouds of hydrogen allow a LOT of star formation… hence their often large and never-ending appearance.

Well- that’s about it! I hoped you learned something about our Solar System- I know I did.

~Maddie